YHWHDa Vinci Code

For those of you that have read the book or gone to the movie, you already know how

the author "teaches" you what he wants you to "think" Leonardo Da Vinci painted here:

Please permit me to provide an explanation for what you are looking at in the above painting, from the imagination of Leonardo, not Dan Brown. This is a "snapshot" in time, just after Yahushua had washed ALL His disciple's feet. Look closely at each person, and how they appear very upset. It is a PASSOVER observance, and the LAMB is Yahushua. Leonardo knew what to paint from what was written at Yn. 13. Turn to it now, and read. Yahushua had just said something seconds before, which clearly caused the men to become agitated. Yahushua stated, "You are not all clean"*, even after He had washed them all. Above, you see how Leonardo IMAGINES the whole room just after Yahushua had said, "Truly, truly (amn, amn), one of you shall deliver Me up." When Yahushua said this, Yahuchanon had his head on Yahushua's breast; but then Shimon Kepha motioned to Yahuchanon to ask WHO IT WAS of whom He spoke. Notice this at verse 13:24. Kepha is whispering into Yahuchanon's ear above. Then, Yahuchanon leaned BACK on the breast of Yahushua and said "Master, who is it?"

In the movie, you will see and hear incredible fabrications that severely distort what the Scripture says and what Leonardo painted from them. The movie explains that the beardless youth, Yahuchanon, is really Miryam of Magdala, Yahushua's WIFE. Hollywood should be so embarrassed that they should release a disclaimer concerning this distortion. But, they are probably as ignorant of the Truth as the average viewer is, and wouldn't understand the problem if it was carefully explained to them. The media also assumes people have an attention span of about 7 seconds. Their opinion of us is very low, or they are getting even for having been teased as children.

* Yahushua is referring to "Judas" (YAHUDAH), so it's a fair assumption that the "Gospel of Judas" is all wet. If we want to start believing that fantasy is fact, then the movie "DRACULA 2000" reveals that DRACULA is actually Judas, who became the UNDEAD. Judas, as you know, hung himself; but the movie "DRACULA 2000" tries to explain that he revived when the sun set. Some people will believe "sound bytes" like this, because they know very little otherwise, having done no personal study of the subject at hand.

WHAT'S NOT TRUE: Without the foundation of Scripture, people can be led to think almost anything is a fact. And, once a mind has been stretched over a new idea, it will never return to its original shape. The only way to correct mistaken impressions is to re-program yourself with the only thing we can trust: Scripture as it is written, without anything added or taken away. The author promotes the idea that Yahushua was married to Miryam of Magdala, one of the old Knights Templar lies.

Yahushua was not, and is not married, except to His true bride, ISRAEL. This fact escapes practically everyone.

the Catholic Church will probably be overlooked by most viewers. There was quite of bit of "teaching" in the movie to prepare us for what they wanted us to believe certain symbols meant; this "front-loading" technique worked well for the movie, but many viewers may come away believing the programming they received to be truth. Way too much was hinging on Leonardo's 15th century painting of the "Last Supper", and who the beardless person is to the right of Yahushua. They really stretched the truth about Da Vinci's painting above. The beardless one in Da Vinci's "Last Supper" is Yahuchanon, as the memoirs also reveal to us - his beardless condition was simply due to his youth. Yahuchanon is the "disciple whom Yahushua loved", and he had laid his head on Yahushua's breast at the Passover (it's only called the "last supper" to divert our attention away from the fact that it was the Passover they were observing!).

The movie promotes the idea that the beardless person in Leonardo's painting is intended to be Miryam of Magdala, and that she was Yahushua's wife. To actually believe this was Leonardo's original intent would be a profound error, one that is hopefully dispelled by comparing Yn. 13 with the actual painting. The idea that there is a "Holy bloodline" living in southern France is a myth that keeps being retold in new ways, but when a person reads the Scriptures for themselves, they won't be swayed by every wind of new doctrine. The true origin of Catholicism being the efforts to peacefully unite the Roman Empire under one religion (universalism) is clearly brought out in the movie. And, the fact that this new religion was a combination or blending of many Pagan religions (multi-headed beast system) is also a truth. Even today, the plans of the "Adepts" involve a way to reduce the global population, and have a one-world religion based on the old feathered-serpent worship of the Indo-Iranians. They plan to make all ancient Pagan religions amalgamate into one, and eliminate all others.

Leonardo Da Vinci: The "ADEPTS" claim Da Vinci as one of their own, along with Cristobal Colombo, Roger Bacon, Quetzalcoatl, and many others. Da Vinci and Isaac Newton are said to have been among a list of Grand Masters of the Priori of Sion, the secret order that was the "puppet master" of the old Knights Templar order. Some have deduced that the Priori of Sion existed long before the Templars, and remain to this day as masters over various orders both within and outside of Catholicism. The "ADEPTS" are those who claim enlightenment, also thinking themselves to be "knights", or illuminists, at the highest levels of masonry. Don't be afraid, Yahushua has overcome the world and its darkness. Everyone born of Yahuah, keeping His Covenant, has overcome the world. The "ADEPTS" don't keep this Covenant with Yahuah, so why should we listen to them?

see 1 Yahuchanon/John 5.

The book and movie are fictional entertainment, no more about reality or history than Raiders of the Lost Ark, or your typical soap opera-cliff-hanger TV series like LOST or SCRUBS.

But, people are programmed by "sound-bytes" they hear in the culture, so the line between reality and fantasy is very easy to blur for the media. The media has been said to be like an echo chamber; once a topic gets into it, it's repeated over and over again. People tend to believe what they hear over and over, especially when it's coming from many sources simultaneously.

The author of the book Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown), and the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail (1982, Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln) were inspired by the legends and stories made up by the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR, a militant order of monks. Reading both books, it seems most likely to me that Dan Brown took everything he wrote about from the former book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail. The only difference is that Brown's book isn't so "bogged down" with historical details, but is more digestible for the average person. Dan came close to having his knickerbockers* sued-off of him. (I heard Dan won the lawsuit).

Seen on various "knights" insignia, the sails of Columbus' ships, hospitals, vehicles in war, and so on . . .

Cristobal Columbo's ships were about the size of a city bus. (Nina, Pinta, Santa Maria)

This is an artist's concept, no cameras were available. The style of the crux may have been slightly different -- but the Knights Templar design (as well as the knights of the Crusades) surely was the source of what was displayed.

Enormous wealth was amassed by these knights due to their stories that stirred the imagination; so the best way to make money is to re-tell the same stories again and again.

What is true in the book/movie, and what is not true, are the things that make it so controversial.

WHAT'S TRUE: The origins and activities of the Catholic Church are exposed, and this exposure is also unsettling to Protestants, since they are the spawn of Catholicism (universalism). (Only their pattern or walk, not the people themselves). Amazingly, what's true in the book/movie may be overlooked by the average person. History was recorded by the victors of wars and inquisitions - Truth has very little to do with it. When the Truth comes along, it sounds like the rantings of an insane person. Constantine, a Pagan emperor, really did attempt to invent a new religion that would bring peace, and he did it by mixing together and appeasing various Pagan religions, along with the belief in the Hebrew Messiah. He thought the SUN and the MESSIAH were synonymous. The rallying symbol of his new religion was the CRUX, which was the most recognized sign to all Pagans: it represented the SUN to most, and to others the womb of Astarte. Christianity was officially born under Constantine's designs and specifications at the "Council of Nicea", 325 CE.

The spin-offs of the Knights Templar such as "Opus Dei", Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta, and the Jesuits would certainly rather not have such a book or movie existing at all, let alone being so widely publicized. But, though fictionally presented in the book, Constantine's Catholicism has in fact been involved in incredibly murderous activities. Let's not forget the Inquisition, which left some 80 MILLION dead over a 600-year period. Galileo Galilei narrowly escaped getting roasted by Cardinal Bellarmine. They were flat-Earthers, doing incredibly stupid stuff progressively faster as time passed, and with more enthusiasm as new tortures and weapons presented themselves. And today, they act like nothing happened at all. One thing I should mention here is that the Opus Dei would never track down and kill any offspring of Yahushua (which the book fictionally presents), because Yahushua has no offspring to kill. Those that the DRAGON pursues (in Revelation) would not be the offspring of Miryam of Magdala, but rather ISRAEL, because the "woman's" offspring are those who hold to the Covenant with Yahuah:

"Then the dragon was enraged at the woman (Israel) and went off to make war against the rest of her offspring- those who obey (Elohim's) Commandments (Torah) and hold to the testimony of Yahushua." Rev 12:16-17

So, this "woman" would be the "good guys"; specifically, the Natsarim within Covenant-keeping Israel (These are the "first fruits", that are supposed to "leaven the whole lump", Israel). If Catholicism were the "good guys", why were they the ones doing the killing? The bad guys are doing the killing, that should be a given. Those being pursued and killed would be those who "obey" Yahuah's Commandments, AND hold to the testimony of Yahushua, so they would be NATSARIM OF ISRAEL. According to logical hermeneutics, Catholicism would be the DRAGON in the passage above.

Examining one of their art promotions below, we see two Knights Templar ride ONE horse in this insignia, as their sign of poverty. But, they were very wealthy! They were so successful they formed the beginnings of European banking.

"The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon (Latin: pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici), popularly known as the Knights Templar, was one of the most famous of the Christian military orders. It existed for about two centuries in the Middle Ages, created in the aftermath of the First Crusade of 1096 to ensure the safety of the large numbers of European pilgrims who flowed towards Jerusalem after its conquest.

The Templars were an unusual order in that they were both monks and soldiers, making them in effect some of the earliest "warrior monks" in the Western world. Members of the Order played a key part in many battles of the Crusades, and the Order's infrastructure innovated many financial techniques that could be considered the foundation of modern banking. The Order grew in membership and power throughout Europe, until it ran afoul of King Philip IV of France (Philip the Fair), who caused many of the order's members in France to be tortured into "confessions" and burned at the stake. Under influence from King Philip, Pope Clement V then forcibly disbanded the order in the early 1300s.

The Knights Templar have become surrounded by legends concerning secrets and mysteries handed down to the select from ancient times. Most of these legends are connected with the long occupation by the order of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, and speculation about what relics the Templars may have found there, such as the Holy Grail, the Ark of the Covenant, or fragments of the True Cross from the Crucifixion. And still more stories were started by fictional embellishments upon the Templar history, such as by Hollywood movies or best-selling novels like The Da Vinci Code.

Other legends have grown around the suspected associations of the Templars. Many organizations claim traditions from the original Order (the Freemasons, for instance, began incorporating Templar symbols and rituals in the 1700s) especially in relation to anonymous charity and good deeds. Some of these organizations which might be associated with the Templars are still active within communities across the globe supporting humanistic causes such as hospitals and medical treatment centers for the less fortunate." (END OF QUOTE)

The Knights Templar insignia, a red "Maltese Crux" on a white background, became the emblem of the "Hospitallers" during the 14th century. They provided traveling pilgrims to Yerushaliyim and other destinations with safety, rest, and treatment from injuries suffered along their way in "hospices", which later developed into our modern idea of a hotel and hospital. Very "hospitable" of them, wouldn't you say?

When you see a "Red Cross", you are looking at a small remnant of the Templars' history. Using insignia effectively can be a very powerful tool to any movement. We Natsarim use as our banner the NAME of Yahuah, and the symbol of His TORAH, His MENORAH. They will remain when all other insignia are forgotten.

*knickerbockers: Baggy trousers worn by young boys; sometimes also used to refer to women's undergarments.

FOSSILIZED PEOPLE -- Here's more fun with mixing-up people with other people:

Aharon, Mosheh's brother Pharaoh Akhenaten, who liked to go slumming around his kingdom

Luke, doctor & author Herod the Great, party animal extraodinaire, self-medicated

John (Yahuchanon), author Miryam from Migdal, once possessed by 7 unclean spirits, one

Peter (Kepha), brother of Andrew Pilate (obsessive hand-washer - kept smelling fish on them)

Ringo Starr (Richard Starkey) Yasser Arafat, Jesuit Beatle-infiltrator and knight

The Beatles Knights Templar invasion group (John later renounced his knight-ship)

74 minutes: CD (audio) KKVV Radio Interview on topics in Fossilized Customs book:

All three men above hated one group of people in a murderous way. Can you guess what group that is?. ISRAEL!